E-Books of Mathematics
source http://fs.gallup.unm.edu//eBooks-otherformats.htm
Smarandache Multi-Space Theory (partially post-doctoral research for the Chinese Academy of Sciences), by Linfan Mao
bullet Automorphism Groups of Maps, Surfaces and Smarandache Geometries (partially post-doctoral research for the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing), by Linfan Mao
bullet Scientific Elements - Applications to Mathematics, Physics, and Other Sciences (international book series): Vol. 1
bullet Smarandache Manifolds, by Howard Iseri
bullet Combinatorial Geometry with Applications to Field Theory, by L. Mao
bullet Smarandache Geometries & Map Theories with Applications (I), by. Linfan Mao
bullet Introductory Map Theory, by Yanpei Liu new
bullet
bullet Interval Neutrosophic Sets and Logic: Theory and Applications in Computing, by H. Wang, F. Smarandache, Y-Q. Zhang, R. Sunderraman
bullet A Unifying Field in Logics: Neutrosophic Logic. Neutrosophy, Neutrosophic Set, Neutrosophic Probability (fourth edition)
bullet Proceedings of the First International Conference on Neutrosophy, Neutrosophic Logic, Neutrosophic Set, Neutrosophic Probability and Statistics
bullet Introduction to Neutrosophic Logic, by C. Ashbacher
bullet
bullet Fuzzy Cognitive Maps and Neutrosophic Cognitive Maps, by W. B. Vasantha Kandasamy, F. Smarandache
bullet Elementary Fuzzy Matrix Theory and Fuzzy Models for Social Scientists
bullet Special Fuzzy Matrices for Social Scientists, by W. B. Vasantha Kandasamy, F. Smarandache, K. Ilanthenral
bullet Super Fuzzy Matrices and Super Fuzzy Models for Social Scientists, by W. B. Vasantha Kandasamy, F. Smarandache, K. Amal
bullet Vedic Mathematics - 'Vedic' or 'Mathematics': A Fuzzy & Neutrosophic Analysis, by W. B. Vasantha Kandasamy, F. Smarandache
bullet Analysis of Social Aspects of Migrant Labourers Living with HIV/AIDS Using Fuzzy Theory and Neutrosophic Cognitive Maps, by W. B. Vasantha Kandasamy, F. Smarandache; translation of the Tamil interviews by M. Kandasamy
bullet Smarandache Neutrosophic Algebraic Structures, by W. B. Vasantha Kandasamy
bullet Introduction to N-Adaptive Fuzzy Models to Analyze Public Opinion on AIDS, by W. B. Vasantha Kandasamy, F. Smarandache
bullet N-Algebraic Structures, by W. B. Vasantha Kandasamy, F. Smarandache
bullet Some Neutrosophic Algebraic Structures and Neutrosophic N-Algebraic Structures, by W. B. Vasantha Kandasamy, F. Smarandache
bullet New Classes of Neutrosophic Linear Algebras, by W. B. Vasantha Kandasamy, Florentin Smarandache, K. Ilanthenral
bullet Fuzzy and Neutrosophic Analysis of Periyar's Views on Untouchability, by W. B. Vasantha Kandasamy, F. Smarandache, K. Kandasamy
bullet Fuzzy Relational Maps and Neutrosophic Relational Maps, by W. B. Vasantha Kandasamy, F. Smarandache
bullet Basic Neutrosophic Algebraic Structures and Their Application to Fuzzy and Neutrosophic Models, by W. B. Vasantha Kandasamy, F. Smarandache
bullet Fuzzy Interval Matrices and Neutrosophic Interval Matrices and their Applications, W. B. Vasantha, F. Smarandache
bullet Fuzzy and Neutrosophic Analysis of Women with HIV/AIDS, by W. B. Vasantha Kandasamy, F. Smarandache
bullet Neutrosophic Rings, by W. B. Vasantha Kandasamy, F. Smarandache
bullet Neutrosophic Bilinear Algebras and Their Generalizations
bullet
bullet Randomness and Optimal Estimation in Data Sampling, by M. Khoshnevisan, S. Saxena, H. P. Singh, S. Singh, F. Smarandache
bullet Artificial Intelligence and Responsive Optimization, by. M. Khoshnevisan, S. Bhattacharya, F. Smarandache
bullet Auxiliary Information and a priori Values in Construction of Improved Estimators, by Rajesh Sigh, Pankaj Chauhan, Nirmala Sawas, F. Smarandache
bullet Studies in Statistical Inference, Sample Techniques and Demography
bullet Computational Modeling in Applied Problems: collected papers on econometrics, operations research, game theory and simulation
bullet
bullet Collected Papers (Vol. I, Vol. II, Vol. III)
bullet Advances and Applications of DSmT for Information Fusion (Collected Works), edited by F. Smarandache, J. Dezert [Vol. I, Vol. II, Vol. III (760 p., 21 MB)]
bullet
bullet Only Problems, not Solutions!
bullet Smarandache Sequences, Stereograms and Series, by C. Ashbacher
bullet Program of the First International Conference on Smarandache Type Notions in Number Theory, University of Craiova (1997)
bullet An Introduction to the Smarandache Function, by Charles Ashbacher
bullet Plucking from the Tree of Smarandache Functions and Sequences, by Charles Ashbacher
bullet A Set of New Smarandache Functions, Sequences, and Conjectures, by Felice Russo
bullet Geometric Theorems, Diophantine Equations, and Arithmetic Functions, by Jozsef Sandor
bullet Collection of Problems on Smarandache Notions, by Charles Ashbacher
bullet Surfing on the Ocean of Numbers, by Henry Ibstedt
bullet Computer Analysis of Number Sequences, by Henry Ibstedt
bullet Wandering in the world of smarandache numbers, by A. A. K. Majumdar new
bullet Generalized Partitions and New Ideas on Number Theory and Smarandache Sequences, by A. Murthy & C. Ashbacher
bullet On Some of the Smarandache's Problems (Vol. I by Krassimir T. Atanassov, Vol. II by Mladen Vassilev-Missana & K. Atanassov)
bullet Definitions, Solved and Unsolved Problems, Conjectures, and Theorems in Number Theory and Geometry, edited by M. L. Perez
bullet Sequences of Numbers Involved in Unsolved Problems
bullet Comments and Topics on Smarandache Notions and Problems, by Kenichiro Kashihara
bullet The Smarandache Function, by C. Dumitrescu & V. Seleacu
bullet Mainly Natural Numbers, by Henry Ibstedt
bullet Research on Smarandache Problems in Number Theory (collected papers) [Vol. I edited by Zhang Wenpeng; Vol. II edited by Zhang Wenpeng, Li Junzhuang, Liu Duansen]
bullet Proceedings of the International Conferences on Number Theory and Smarandache Notions held in CHINA, edited by Z. Wenpeng (Fifth Conference at Shangluo University in 2009; Sixth Conference at Tianshui Normal University in 2010)
bullet Applications of Smarandache Function, Prime and Coprime Functions [English] [Espanol], by Sebastian Martin Ruiz
bullet
Généralisations et Généralités [French]
bullet Problèmes Avec et Sans... Problèmes! [French]
bullet Proposed Problems of Mathematics, Vol. II
bullet Probleme Compilate şi Rezolvate de Geometrie şi Trigonometrie [Romanian]
bullet Metode de Calcul in Analiza Matematica [Romanian]
bullet Noi Funcţii în Teoria Numerelor [Romanian]
bullet Asupra Unor Noi Funcţii în Teoria Numerelor [Romanian]
bullet Algebra în exerciţii şi probleme pentru liceu. Mulţimi. Operaţii cu mulţimi. Relaţii şi funcţii. Elemente de combinatorică. [Romanian], I. Goian, R. Grigor, V. Marin, F. Smarandache
bullet
bullet
Алгебра в упражнениях и задачах для лицеев. Множества. Операции над
множествами. Отношения и функции. Элементы комбинаторики; Гоян И.,
Григор Р., Марин В., Смарандаке Ф. [Russian]
bullet
bullet Smarandache Algebraic Structures, book series by W. B. Vasantha Kandasamy: (Vol. I: Groupoids; Vol. II: Semigroups; Vol. III: Semirings, Semifields, and Semivector Spaces; Vol. IV: Loops; Vol. V: Rings; Vol. VI: Near-rings; Vol. VII: Non-associative Rings; Vol. VIII: Bialgebraic Structures; Vol. IX: Fuzzy Algebra; Vol. X: Linear Algebra; Vol. XI: Special Definite Algebraic Structures)
bullet A Study of New Concepts in Smarandache Quasigroups and Loops, by Jaiyeola Temitope Gbolahan
bullet Introduction to Bimatrices, by W. B. Vasantha Kandasamy, F. Smarandache, K.Ilanthenral
bullet Applications of Bimatrices to some Fuzzy and Neutrosophic Models, by W. B. Vasantha Kandasamy, F. Smarandache, K.Ilanthenral
bullet Superbimatrices and Their Generalizations
bullet Introduction to Linear Bialgebra, by W. B. Vasantha Kandasamy, F. Smarandache, K. Ilanthenral
bullet New Classes of Codes for Cryptologists and Computer Scientists
bullet Special Classes of Set Codes and Their Applications
bullet Super Special Codes Using Super Matrices new
bullet Rank Distance Bicodes and Their Generalization
bullet Methods in Industrial Biotechnology for Chemical Engineers
bullet Methods in Environmental Biotechnology for Environmentalists
bullet Groups as Graphs
bullet Interval Groupoids new
bullet Set Linear Algebra and Set Fuzzy Linear Algebra
bullet Special Set Linear Algebra and Special Set Fuzzy Linear Algebra
bullet Interval Linear Algebra new
bullet Super Linear Algebra
bullet n-Linear Algebra of Type I and Its Applications
bullet n-Linear Algebra of Type II
bullet
bullet Multispace & Multistructure. Neutrosophic Transdisciplinarity (100 Collected Papers of Science) [800 p., 9 MB] new
E-Books of Philosophy
bullet A Unifying Field in Logics: Neutrosophic Logic. Neutrosophy, Neutrosophic Set, Neutrosophic Probability and Statistics (fourth edition)
bullet Сущность нейтрософии; Смарадаке Ф.(перевод Д. Рабунского)[Russian]
逻辑学的统一：中智逻辑 中智学，中智集合论，中智概率论 (Chinese) [1, 2]
中道辩证法与唯道主义自然哲学[Chinese Neutrosophy and Taoist Natural Philosophy](Chinese)
Proceedings of the First International Conference on Neutrosophy, Neutrosophic Logic, Neutrosophic Set, Neutrosophic Probability and Statistics
Neutrosophic Dialogues, by F. Smarandache, F. Liu
Neutrality and Many-Valued Logics, by A. Schumann, F. Smarandache
Neutrosophy in Arabic Philosophy, by F. Smarandache, Salah Osman
E-Books of Physics
bullet Neutrosophic Physics: More Problems, More Solutions
bullet Hadron models and related New Energy issues (collective book) [476 p., 5.8 MB]
bullet Quantization in Astrophysics, Brownian Motion, and Supersymmetry (collective book) [516 p., 6.2 MB]
bullet Unfolding the Labyrinth: Open Problems in Physics, Mathematics, Astrophysics, and Other Areas of Science, by F. Smarandache, V. Christianto, Fu Yuhua, R. Khrapko, J. Hutchison
bullet Neutrosophic Methods in General Relativity, by D. Rabounski, F. Smarandache, L. Borissova
bullet
Нейтрософские методы в Общей Теории Относительности; Рабунский Д.,
Смарандаке Ф., Борисова Л.[Russian]
bullet Today's Take on Einstein's Relativity, Proceedings of Pima Community College Conference, edited by H. B. Tilton, F. Smarandache
bullet G-Dimensional Theory, by L. Stephen Young
bullet Begin the Adventure / How to Break the Light Barrier by A.D. 2070, by H. B. Tilton, F. Smarandache (third edition)
bullet Multi-Valued Logic, Neutrosophy, and Schrödinger Equation, by F. Smarandache, V. Christianto
bullet Neutrosophic Logic, Wave Mechanics, and Other Stories (Selected Works 2005-2008)
E-Books of Finance, Economics, Business, Social Sciences
bullet Cultural Advantage for Cities: An Alternative for Developing Countries
bullet Cultural Advantages in China. Tale of Six Cities
bullet Global Totalitarianism and the Working Animals
bullet Utility, Rationality and Beyond - From Finance to Informational Finance (Ph. D. Dissertation, Bond University), by S. Bhattacharya
bullet Reservation for Other Backward Classes in Indian Central Government Institutions Like IITs, IIMs and AIIMS – A Study of the Role of Media Fuzzy Super FRM Models
E-Books of Linguistics
bullet If anything can go wrong, pass it on to someone else (Florentin's Laws) new
bullet The dictator lifts the state of emergency with a crane (Florentin's Clichés) new
bullet Send me an e-male (Florentin's Homonyms) new
bullet Experimental paradoxist Linguistics (Florentin's Lexicon)
E-Journals of Science
bullet International Journal of Mathematical Combinatorics: 2007 (Vol. 1); 2008 (Vol. 1, Vol. 2, Vol. 3); 2009 (Vol. 1, Vol. 2, Vol. 3, Vol. 4); 2010 (Vol. 1, Vol. 2, Vol. 3 new)
bullet Smarandache Notions Journal (Vol. 1, Vol. 2-3, Vol. 4-5, Vol. 6, Vol. 7, Vol. 8, Vol. 9, Vol. 10, Vol. 11, Vol. 12, Vol. 13, Vol. 14)
bullet Notes on Number Theory and Discrete Mathematics (Vol. 9, No. 2, 2003)
bullet
Scientia Magna: 2005 (Vol. 1, No. 1; Vol. 1, No.2); 2006 (Vol. 2, No. 1; Vol. 2, No. 2, Vol. 2, No. 3, Vol. 2, No. 4); 2007 (Vol. 3, No. 1; Vol. 3, No. 2; Vol. 3, No. 3; Vol. 3, No. 4); 2008 (Vol. 4, No. 1; Vol. 4, No. 2, Vol. 4, No. 3, Vol. 4, No. 4); 2009 (Vol. 5, No. 1, Vol. 5, No. 2, Vol. 5, No. 3; Vol. 5, No. 4); 2010 (Vol. 6, No. 1; Vol. 6, No. 2 new)
bullet
Progress in Physics journal: 2005 (Vol. 1, Vol. 2, Vol. 3); 2006 (Vol. 1, Vol. 2, Vol. 3, Vol. 4); 2007 (Vol. 1, Vol. 2, Vol. 3, Vol. 4); 2008 (Vol. 1, Vol. 2, Vol. 3, Vol. 4); 2009 (Vol. 1, No. 2, Vol. 3, Vol. 4); 2010 (Vol. 1, Vol. 2, Vol. 3, Vol. 4 new)
Kamis, 16 Desember 2010
Minggu, 21 November 2010
Some implications of human genome research and its ethical discourse
by Jesus Christ
Despite a number of widespreading article [2][3] considering the completion and possible advantages of human genome project (HGP), there are only few article which focus on ethical concerns related to HGP, see article [1] for instance. These ethical concerns include germline intervention and also enhancement engineering.
“Germline interventions involve more significant ethical concerns, because risks will extend across generations, magnifying the impact of unforeseen consequences. While these greater risks call for added caution, most ethicists would not object to the use of germline interventions for the treatment of serious disease if we reach the point where such interventions could be performed safely and effectively.”[1]
“Enhancement engineering is widely regarded as both scientifically and ethically problematic. From a scientific standpoint, it is unlikely that we will soon be able to enhance normally functioning genes without risking grave side effects.”[1]
*
Furthermore, one should keep in mind that Genome Project was actually a sequence of eugenics research in the past (eugenics office was part of the United Nations shortly after the Second World War, and eugenics are still being practiced in the form of depopulation policy(ii)), and therefore it should be considered more cautiously with respect to ethics and moral conducts in practice. In practice, however, there is risk that enhancement engineering is translated to become genetic enrichment, but then there is question concerning who is responsible for both the effect of enrichment and whether the treatment will not leave under-developed countries in unwelcome condition. For instance, if numerous kids in developed countries receive genetic enrichment while people in underdeveloped countries do not receive that treatment because of economics consideration, then can it be considered as malthusian selection?
In general, malthusian selection(i) is a way created by human to introduce certain effects in order to create preferences of certain race with respect to its probability of survival. By introducing malthusian selection effect to a particular race then such a practice can be considered as violation of human right, since it would mean that certain genetic treatment and enhancement are available only for certain race for particular malthusian reasons.
Whether such a malthusian selection is true or not is yet to be confirmed by either NIH or genome project consortium, and it is apparent that genetic enhancement will not be considered available to many human being in the foreseeable future. It is much more making sense that genetic engineers who are doctors that are responsible for genetic enhancement only offer their special service for a particular number of patients who are economically possible to give them better position to get genetic enhancement and enrichment treatment.
Apart from malthusian aspects of such enhancement engineering,[1] there are other aspects of both genetic and genome related research which can be considered unethical, that is: who will be the subject of genome extensive research in the forthcoming years. It is known that for certain basic research, researchers often use mice or other animals, but for disease treatment and other drug related research, it is often required to conduct treatment test to human being. But as the effect of genetic treatment or enhancement will be spreading and extended towards other genetic related persons of the subject being treated medically, then whom will offer themselves to be the lab mice? History tells us that the victims of such drug testing abuse were often soldiers, prisoners, or people in under-developed countries. See for example the movie “Constant Gardener” (based on true story) in order you to know how such an abuse can be very large scale and country-wide, and sometimes it is backed by soldiers from developed countries. Such unethical practices and abuse in drug testing and also in using obsolete drug should be stopped and be avoided completely.
Concluding remarks
We have discussed a number of ethical considerations related to genome research and results of human genome project’s efforts. It becomes clearly apparent that there are ethical risks and also numerous questions which are open and yet to be defined by those reputable team, especially concerning the use of genetic enhancement and genetic enrichment of particular human being in comparison with other human being given differences in economics position in society.
If such questions are deemed to be valid then one should begin to explore further ethical and critical questions concerning suitability of particular treatment as a means of both malthusian selection or social darwinism agenda, which resemble in sort of eugenics in the past. These questions demand further thinking and ethical considerations beyond what are common to most common genetic engineers.
November 21st, 2010
VC, from http://www.sciprint.org
Email: VictorChristianto@gmail.com
References:
[1] M. Carroll & J. Ciaffa (2003), “The Human Genome Project: a scientific and ethical overview,” http://www.actionbioscience.org/genomic/carroll_ciaffa.html
[2] NIH (2010) http://ghr.nlm.nih.gov/handbook/hgp.pdf dated November 7, 2010
[3] http://www.nytimes.com/2001/02/13/science/an-online-tour-of-the-human-genome-is-just-a-few-clicks-away.html
Endnote:
(i) malthusian selection, on the other hand, is proposed as a force for selection at the level of populations in addition to natural selection. "...the malthusian paradigm pictures competition between organisms of the same species as an important force. Attention was shifted from the struggle between the lion and the lamb to that between the lamb and the lamb." source: http://members.optusnet.com.au/exponentialist/malthus_evolution.htm
(ii) depopulation policy. See NSSM 200, that is depopulation policy as part social darwinism. Source: http://policestateplanning.com/chapter_14_.htm
Despite a number of widespreading article [2][3] considering the completion and possible advantages of human genome project (HGP), there are only few article which focus on ethical concerns related to HGP, see article [1] for instance. These ethical concerns include germline intervention and also enhancement engineering.
“Germline interventions involve more significant ethical concerns, because risks will extend across generations, magnifying the impact of unforeseen consequences. While these greater risks call for added caution, most ethicists would not object to the use of germline interventions for the treatment of serious disease if we reach the point where such interventions could be performed safely and effectively.”[1]
“Enhancement engineering is widely regarded as both scientifically and ethically problematic. From a scientific standpoint, it is unlikely that we will soon be able to enhance normally functioning genes without risking grave side effects.”[1]
*
Furthermore, one should keep in mind that Genome Project was actually a sequence of eugenics research in the past (eugenics office was part of the United Nations shortly after the Second World War, and eugenics are still being practiced in the form of depopulation policy(ii)), and therefore it should be considered more cautiously with respect to ethics and moral conducts in practice. In practice, however, there is risk that enhancement engineering is translated to become genetic enrichment, but then there is question concerning who is responsible for both the effect of enrichment and whether the treatment will not leave under-developed countries in unwelcome condition. For instance, if numerous kids in developed countries receive genetic enrichment while people in underdeveloped countries do not receive that treatment because of economics consideration, then can it be considered as malthusian selection?
In general, malthusian selection(i) is a way created by human to introduce certain effects in order to create preferences of certain race with respect to its probability of survival. By introducing malthusian selection effect to a particular race then such a practice can be considered as violation of human right, since it would mean that certain genetic treatment and enhancement are available only for certain race for particular malthusian reasons.
Whether such a malthusian selection is true or not is yet to be confirmed by either NIH or genome project consortium, and it is apparent that genetic enhancement will not be considered available to many human being in the foreseeable future. It is much more making sense that genetic engineers who are doctors that are responsible for genetic enhancement only offer their special service for a particular number of patients who are economically possible to give them better position to get genetic enhancement and enrichment treatment.
Apart from malthusian aspects of such enhancement engineering,[1] there are other aspects of both genetic and genome related research which can be considered unethical, that is: who will be the subject of genome extensive research in the forthcoming years. It is known that for certain basic research, researchers often use mice or other animals, but for disease treatment and other drug related research, it is often required to conduct treatment test to human being. But as the effect of genetic treatment or enhancement will be spreading and extended towards other genetic related persons of the subject being treated medically, then whom will offer themselves to be the lab mice? History tells us that the victims of such drug testing abuse were often soldiers, prisoners, or people in under-developed countries. See for example the movie “Constant Gardener” (based on true story) in order you to know how such an abuse can be very large scale and country-wide, and sometimes it is backed by soldiers from developed countries. Such unethical practices and abuse in drug testing and also in using obsolete drug should be stopped and be avoided completely.
Concluding remarks
We have discussed a number of ethical considerations related to genome research and results of human genome project’s efforts. It becomes clearly apparent that there are ethical risks and also numerous questions which are open and yet to be defined by those reputable team, especially concerning the use of genetic enhancement and genetic enrichment of particular human being in comparison with other human being given differences in economics position in society.
If such questions are deemed to be valid then one should begin to explore further ethical and critical questions concerning suitability of particular treatment as a means of both malthusian selection or social darwinism agenda, which resemble in sort of eugenics in the past. These questions demand further thinking and ethical considerations beyond what are common to most common genetic engineers.
November 21st, 2010
VC, from http://www.sciprint.org
Email: VictorChristianto@gmail.com
References:
[1] M. Carroll & J. Ciaffa (2003), “The Human Genome Project: a scientific and ethical overview,” http://www.actionbioscience.org/genomic/carroll_ciaffa.html
[2] NIH (2010) http://ghr.nlm.nih.gov/handbook/hgp.pdf dated November 7, 2010
[3] http://www.nytimes.com/2001/02/13/science/an-online-tour-of-the-human-genome-is-just-a-few-clicks-away.html
Endnote:
(i) malthusian selection, on the other hand, is proposed as a force for selection at the level of populations in addition to natural selection. "...the malthusian paradigm pictures competition between organisms of the same species as an important force. Attention was shifted from the struggle between the lion and the lamb to that between the lamb and the lamb." source: http://members.optusnet.com.au/exponentialist/malthus_evolution.htm
(ii) depopulation policy. See NSSM 200, that is depopulation policy as part social darwinism. Source: http://policestateplanning.com/chapter_14_.htm
Senin, 25 Oktober 2010
Grand Designer, GOD & Science
Dear Advisors, Authors & Readers of SGJ:
Scientific GOD Journal has just published its latest issue Volume 1 Issue 7
entitled "Grand Designer, GOD & Science, Before Big Bang" at
http://scigod.com/index.php/sgj. We invite you to review the Table of
Contents here and then visit SGJ web site to review articles and items of
interest.
Thanks for the continuing interest in and suppor of SGJ,
Huping Hu
Scientific GOD Inc.
editor@scigod.com
Scientific GOD Journal
Vol 1, No 7 (2010): Grand Designer, GOD & Science, Before Big Bang
Table of Contents
http://scigod.com/index.php/sgj/issue/view/7
Articles
--------
The Grand Designer: Can Hawking's Godless Theory of Everything Run without
GOD
Graham P. Smetham
Essays
--------
Some Reflections on God and Science
Himangsu S. Pal
Timeless & Climax
Himangsu S. Pal
Book Review
--------
Review of Stephen C. Meyer’s Book: Signature in the Cell: DNA and the
Evidence for Intelligent Design
Stephen P. Smith
Review of Stuart Kauffman’s Book: Reinventing the Sacred: A New View of
Science, Reason, and Religion
Stephen P. Smith
Review of Mike Gene’s Book: The Design Matrix: A Consilience of Clues
Stephen P. Smith
Review of John C. Landon’s Book: World History and the Eonic Effect:
Civilization, Darwinism, and Theories of Evolution
Stephen P. Smith
Review of Frank Ryan’s Book: Darwin's Blind Spot: Evolution beyond
Natural Selection
Stephen P. Smith
Forum
--------
Horizon: Before the Big Bang
Philip E. Gibbs
What before Big Bang?
Matti Pitkanen
Scientific GOD Journal has just published its latest issue Volume 1 Issue 7
entitled "Grand Designer, GOD & Science, Before Big Bang" at
http://scigod.com/index.php/sgj. We invite you to review the Table of
Contents here and then visit SGJ web site to review articles and items of
interest.
Thanks for the continuing interest in and suppor of SGJ,
Huping Hu
Scientific GOD Inc.
editor@scigod.com
Scientific GOD Journal
Vol 1, No 7 (2010): Grand Designer, GOD & Science, Before Big Bang
Table of Contents
http://scigod.com/index.php/sgj/issue/view/7
Articles
--------
The Grand Designer: Can Hawking's Godless Theory of Everything Run without
GOD
Graham P. Smetham
Essays
--------
Some Reflections on God and Science
Himangsu S. Pal
Timeless & Climax
Himangsu S. Pal
Book Review
--------
Review of Stephen C. Meyer’s Book: Signature in the Cell: DNA and the
Evidence for Intelligent Design
Stephen P. Smith
Review of Stuart Kauffman’s Book: Reinventing the Sacred: A New View of
Science, Reason, and Religion
Stephen P. Smith
Review of Mike Gene’s Book: The Design Matrix: A Consilience of Clues
Stephen P. Smith
Review of John C. Landon’s Book: World History and the Eonic Effect:
Civilization, Darwinism, and Theories of Evolution
Stephen P. Smith
Review of Frank Ryan’s Book: Darwin's Blind Spot: Evolution beyond
Natural Selection
Stephen P. Smith
Forum
--------
Horizon: Before the Big Bang
Philip E. Gibbs
What before Big Bang?
Matti Pitkanen
Minggu, 03 Oktober 2010
Scientific GOD Journal has just published new issue
Scientific GOD Journal: (download link di: http://scigod.com/file/SGJ_V1%286%29.pdf)
Scientific GOD Journal has just published Volume 1 Issue 6 entitled
"Mysteries of Creation, Evolution & the Void" at
http://scigod.com/index.php/sgj. We invite you to review the Table of
Contents here and then visit SGJ web site to review articles and items of
interest.
Thanks for the continuing interest in and support of SGJ,
Very truly yours,
Huping Hu
SGJ Editor
Scientific GOD Inc.
editor@scigod.com
Scientific GOD Journal
Vol 1, No 6 (2010): Mysteries of Creation, Evolution & the Void
Table of Contents
http://scigod.com/index.php/sgj/issue/view/6
Articles
--------
Another Look at Physics: It's a Dynamic Universe
Diosdado F. Fragata
Mystical Experiences
--------
How This Place Works
Clifford White
Essays
--------
The Templix of GNOS
Yale S. Landsberg
GOD, Scientists & the Void
Himangsu S. Paul
Book Review
--------
Review of Suzan Mazur's Book: The Altenberg 16: An Exposé of the Evolution
Industry
Stephen P. Smith
Review of Jerry A. Fodor & Massimo Piattelli-Palmarini's Book: What Darwin
Got Wrong
Stephen P. Smith
Review of Amit Goswami's Book: Creative Evolution: A Physicist's Resolution
between Darwinism and Intelligent Design
Stephen P. Smith
Review of Michael J. Behe's Book: The Edge of Evolution: The Search for
the Limits of Darwinism
Stephen P. Smith
Review of S. Conway Morris' Book: Life's Solution: Inevitable Humans in a
Lonely Universe
Stephen P. Smith
Forum
--------
Grand Design, Intelligent Designer, or Simply GOD: Stephen Hawking and His
“Hoax”
Victor Christianto
Krauss Misunderstands Energy in General Relativity to Argue against GOD
Philip E. Gibbs
GOD & Hawking
Matti Pitkanen
Scientific GOD Journal has just published Volume 1 Issue 6 entitled
"Mysteries of Creation, Evolution & the Void" at
http://scigod.com/index.php/sgj. We invite you to review the Table of
Contents here and then visit SGJ web site to review articles and items of
interest.
Thanks for the continuing interest in and support of SGJ,
Very truly yours,
Huping Hu
SGJ Editor
Scientific GOD Inc.
editor@scigod.com
Scientific GOD Journal
Vol 1, No 6 (2010): Mysteries of Creation, Evolution & the Void
Table of Contents
http://scigod.com/index.php/sgj/issue/view/6
Articles
--------
Another Look at Physics: It's a Dynamic Universe
Diosdado F. Fragata
Mystical Experiences
--------
How This Place Works
Clifford White
Essays
--------
The Templix of GNOS
Yale S. Landsberg
GOD, Scientists & the Void
Himangsu S. Paul
Book Review
--------
Review of Suzan Mazur's Book: The Altenberg 16: An Exposé of the Evolution
Industry
Stephen P. Smith
Review of Jerry A. Fodor & Massimo Piattelli-Palmarini's Book: What Darwin
Got Wrong
Stephen P. Smith
Review of Amit Goswami's Book: Creative Evolution: A Physicist's Resolution
between Darwinism and Intelligent Design
Stephen P. Smith
Review of Michael J. Behe's Book: The Edge of Evolution: The Search for
the Limits of Darwinism
Stephen P. Smith
Review of S. Conway Morris' Book: Life's Solution: Inevitable Humans in a
Lonely Universe
Stephen P. Smith
Forum
--------
Grand Design, Intelligent Designer, or Simply GOD: Stephen Hawking and His
“Hoax”
Victor Christianto
Krauss Misunderstands Energy in General Relativity to Argue against GOD
Philip E. Gibbs
GOD & Hawking
Matti Pitkanen
Rabu, 08 September 2010
where is location of the true Menorah?
by Jesus Christ
While the location of the original Menorah apparently remains unknown, there is spiritual teaching that we can learn from the Bible concerning the Menorah and implications to our life. [1] Nonetheless, there is recent archaeological finding concerning this Menorah[3].
a. First the Menorah represents Jesus as the true Light of the world. See also the book of Gospel of John chapter 1.
b. The Menorah represents that we are God's menorah in the earth. All the branches come out from one tree, and that is the same we can be the light and the salt of the world provided we live in the true vine. See Matthew 5:14, and the book of Gospel of John 15:1. Quote: "Graphically, the menorah expresses our commitment to uphold the Divine Light, and the Wisdom of Torah, to the nations. Its form is that of a tree growing upward, with a trunk, and three branches shooing upwards out of the central trunk. The seven branches reflect the diversity of God's people, as a seven-branch complete continuum."[2]
c. The prophet Zechariah identifies them as "the eyes of the LORD, ranging over the whole earth" (Zech.4:10). [1][2]
So, now you know how pure your life should be, because you are the light of the world but you should not do that alone, because you are only one branches, and each branch should shine in tune with other branches, and they shall get oil from the One Source, and Jesus Christ is the only true Vine.
8 sept 2010
love, Jesus Christ
references:
[1] Zechariah 4:1-10.
[2] W.F. Dankenbring, Mystery of Menorah,
url: http://www.breadoflifebiblestudy.com/Lessons/21OldTestamentTypologies/Articles/Menorah1.pdf
[3] source: http://www.physorg.com/news171910228.html
url:
follow Jesus Christ only at http://www.twitter.com/guidetorepent
http://guidetorepent.uphero.com/index.html
http://guidetorepent.multiply.com
http://message.diigo.com/user/guidetorepent
http://Guidetorepent.blogspot.com
http://findtheTruthnow.blogspot.com
http://evangelismwithsocialmedia.blogspot.com
http://www.esnips.com/web/Guidetorepent
http://www.esnips.com/web/RepentanceGuide
http://www.facebook.com/guidetorepent
http://www.twitter.com/vChristianto
While the location of the original Menorah apparently remains unknown, there is spiritual teaching that we can learn from the Bible concerning the Menorah and implications to our life. [1] Nonetheless, there is recent archaeological finding concerning this Menorah[3].
a. First the Menorah represents Jesus as the true Light of the world. See also the book of Gospel of John chapter 1.
b. The Menorah represents that we are God's menorah in the earth. All the branches come out from one tree, and that is the same we can be the light and the salt of the world provided we live in the true vine. See Matthew 5:14, and the book of Gospel of John 15:1. Quote: "Graphically, the menorah expresses our commitment to uphold the Divine Light, and the Wisdom of Torah, to the nations. Its form is that of a tree growing upward, with a trunk, and three branches shooing upwards out of the central trunk. The seven branches reflect the diversity of God's people, as a seven-branch complete continuum."[2]
c. The prophet Zechariah identifies them as "the eyes of the LORD, ranging over the whole earth" (Zech.4:10). [1][2]
So, now you know how pure your life should be, because you are the light of the world but you should not do that alone, because you are only one branches, and each branch should shine in tune with other branches, and they shall get oil from the One Source, and Jesus Christ is the only true Vine.
8 sept 2010
love, Jesus Christ
references:
[1] Zechariah 4:1-10.
[2] W.F. Dankenbring, Mystery of Menorah,
url: http://www.breadoflifebiblestudy.com/Lessons/21OldTestamentTypologies/Articles/Menorah1.pdf
[3] source: http://www.physorg.com/news171910228.html
url:
follow Jesus Christ only at http://www.twitter.com/guidetorepent
http://guidetorepent.uphero.com/index.html
http://guidetorepent.multiply.com
http://message.diigo.com/user/guidetorepent
http://Guidetorepent.blogspot.com
http://findtheTruthnow.blogspot.com
http://evangelismwithsocialmedia.blogspot.com
http://www.esnips.com/web/Guidetorepent
http://www.esnips.com/web/RepentanceGuide
http://www.facebook.com/guidetorepent
http://www.twitter.com/vChristianto
Jumat, 03 September 2010
how ExxonMobil has adopted the tobacco industry's disinformation tactics
TruthSeeker says:
Yes I heard that:
Both Exxon and Koch are actively funding anti-global campaigns and websites.
--Between 1997 and 2008, Koch Industries donated a total of nearly $48 million to climate opposition groups
--A report from the Union of Concerned Scientists offers the most comprehensive documentation to date of how ExxonMobil has adopted the tobacco industry's disinformation tactics, as well as some of the same organizations and personnel, to cloud the scientific understanding of climate change and delay action on the issue. According to the report, ExxonMobil has funneled nearly $16 million between 1998 and 2005 to a network of 43 advocacy organizations that seek to confuse the public on global warming science.
Smoke, Mirrors & Hot Air: How ExxonMobil Uses Big Tobacco's Tactics to "Manufacture Uncertainty" on Climate Change details how the oil company, like the tobacco industry in previous decades, has
* raised doubts about even the most indisputable scientific evidence
* funded an array of front organizations to create the appearance of a broad platform for a tight-knit group of vocal climate change contrarians who misrepresent peer-reviewed scientific findings
* attempted to portray its opposition to action as a positive quest for "sound science" rather than business self-interest
* used its access to the Bush administration to block federal policies and shape government communications on global warming
http://www.ucsusa.org/global_warming/science_and_impacts/global_warming_contrarians/exxonmobil-report-smoke.html
source: http://www.amazon.com/tag/science/forum/ref=cm_cd_dp_rft_tft_tp?_encoding=UTF8&cdForum=FxZ58KVEERYS5E&cdThread=Tx387OL2AOMA3SK
Yes I heard that:
Both Exxon and Koch are actively funding anti-global campaigns and websites.
--Between 1997 and 2008, Koch Industries donated a total of nearly $48 million to climate opposition groups
--A report from the Union of Concerned Scientists offers the most comprehensive documentation to date of how ExxonMobil has adopted the tobacco industry's disinformation tactics, as well as some of the same organizations and personnel, to cloud the scientific understanding of climate change and delay action on the issue. According to the report, ExxonMobil has funneled nearly $16 million between 1998 and 2005 to a network of 43 advocacy organizations that seek to confuse the public on global warming science.
Smoke, Mirrors & Hot Air: How ExxonMobil Uses Big Tobacco's Tactics to "Manufacture Uncertainty" on Climate Change details how the oil company, like the tobacco industry in previous decades, has
* raised doubts about even the most indisputable scientific evidence
* funded an array of front organizations to create the appearance of a broad platform for a tight-knit group of vocal climate change contrarians who misrepresent peer-reviewed scientific findings
* attempted to portray its opposition to action as a positive quest for "sound science" rather than business self-interest
* used its access to the Bush administration to block federal policies and shape government communications on global warming
http://www.ucsusa.org/global_warming/science_and_impacts/global_warming_contrarians/exxonmobil-report-smoke.html
source: http://www.amazon.com/tag/science/forum/ref=cm_cd_dp_rft_tft_tp?_encoding=UTF8&cdForum=FxZ58KVEERYS5E&cdThread=Tx387OL2AOMA3SK
Kamis, 02 September 2010
grand design, intelligent designer, or simply God: stephen hawking and his hoax
by Jesus Christ
There are a number of good reason to say that big bang support evolution theory's idea of creation by pure statistical chance alone. And that is why: some people do think that big bang can happen out of nothing. That standpoint of view, albeit not new, are reiterated by stephen hawking from cambridge, in his latest book: the grand design.[1][2]
Another middle-point of view, if you are believer of middle-viewpoint, is that there is a substantial amount of complexity which is irreducible in nature, sufficient enough to say that there must be the Grand Intelligent Designer, according to Behe and a host of other proponents of ID.[3][4] But still they do not want to admit that there should be God who are behind those flawless creations.
Now if you are really an astronomy person, you can free your mind of those emotional baggage from philosophical school or other teacher who do not prove anything in their life, and start to think afresh from data:
a. if big bang is true, then the universe stabilise and evolve to become more and more structured, but that is contradiction to the basic proposition of second law of thermodynamics, that entropy is created continuously along the time. Using this argument alone, which stephen hawking should be more adept because he is famous for his black hole entropy which has never been observed.
b. furthermore, typical of philosopher like stephen hawking (even if he said that philosophy is dead), he only wish to have his words heard, regardless without sufficient proof. For you to know, according to black hole proponents, there should be blackhole inside the galaxy center of our Milky way. But despite there is very large mass inside the Milky way center, its center remains bright, that is enough disproof for the entire career of stephen hawking.
c. if you are honest astronomer, there is growing consensus of the universal law which suggest not only irreducible complexity, but also scale-organization (note that this time we do not use, self-organization). By scale organization we mean that there is seemingly organization accross different scale, which can be characterized for instance by hausdorff dimension ~2, for instance accross different astrophysics observation.[6] There is also hint pointing toward ordering in nature, for instance quantization of planets both in solar system and beyond (exoplanets) seem to suggest that the Grand Designer, means clearly God, do create and recreate the universe.[7]
d. some other clever physicist like Erwin Schrodinger has suggested that there should be negative-entropy in order to resolve the problem of entropy in the big bang and time progress, but nobody seem to observe the negative entropy.
e. similar hausdorff measure can be found in quantum mechanics. Feynman already mentioned that quantum mechanics are characterized by dimension ~2. See the work of Ord, Nottale, and others for they are already completing their program concerning scale relativity theory.[7]
f. even if your calculation points to something, which this time we should verify if stephen hawking calculate his own proposition, saying that you can create something out of nothing is not only ridiculous but awkward, just the same way as you always think of black hole which do not exist.
g. Hawking apparently argue in his last book, that based on quantum theory then the universe has multiverse-history, but that is only if we accept the notion of sum-over-history and path-integral quantum mechanics. The meaning is that what he says is full of 'ifs', furthermore hawking's model is full of fine-tuning of parameters (We discuss how the laws of our particular universe are extraordinarily finely tuned so as to allow for our existence), just like what M-theory proponents are busy trying in order they can explain elementary particles. Do not be disguised by hawking often poking with philosophical questions, because this guy has not the same quality of Einstein to ponder things deeply even with simple thinking-experiment. The result of quantization model in astrophysics, suggest that the distance between the Sun and Earth, for instance is not result of anthropic principle, but can be derived from a wave-equation model.[7] Actually, anthropic principle is another circular logic type of thinking, kind of thinking which an old guy tend to use to fool a young student.
h. another remarkable coincidence is that the Cosmic Microwave Background Temperature, that is 2.73 degree Kelvin, are surprisingly resemble menger sponge dimension. In other words, the Cosmos may look like a big sponge just like what Zel'dovich outlined few years ago.[8]
i. of course, microbiologist or palaeonthologist or philantrophist like bill gates perhaps has their own way to say whether they prefer to be believers of God or not. And even if you are a philosophy student, then you may have risk to get your grade scaled down only because you admit that you do not swallow all evolution garbage.
Finally, to quote last comment by Paul Sheldon in [1]:
"I choose to believe in a God that is so kind as to permit me to understand without dismissing me with “Just because I said so”. Such a God does do something in the universe: he is what Jaim Ginnott called a good teacher/student. My faith says I and the entire research community are manifestations of God."
What can we conclude from enormous number of astronomic observation? Apparently, if one is humble enough, then one can say along with the Psalm 19:1 : “The heavens declare the glory of God; and the firmament sheweth His handy work.” And that: “God looked down from heaven upon the children of men, to see if there were any that did understand, that did seek God.” (Psalm 53:2).
Sept. 3, 2010
love, Jesus Christ
references:
[1] http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2010/09/02/stephen-hawking-settles-the-god-question-once-and-for-all/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+CosmicVarianceBlog+%28Cosmic+Variance%29&utm_content=Twitter
[2] the grand design and some criticism, http://www.amazon.com/Grand-Design-Stephen-Hawking/dp/0553805371/
[3] comment to Behe's Darwin's Black Box: The Biochemical Challenge to Evolution, http://www.creationismstrojanhorse.com/Gross_Behe_Review_10.2007.pdf
[4] other comment on Behe,http://pondside.uchicago.edu/cluster/pdf/coyne/Behe, www.kean.edu/~bregal/docs/Behe.pdf
[5] see this smitsonian picture of center of Milky Way. In other words, milky way center show a bar and bright center, and not a black hole. url: http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2005/08/0817_050817_milkywaybar.html
[6] there is K measure suggest such large Hausdorff dimension ~2 to large scale structures, Martinis And Sosic, arXiv:astro-ph/0708.0173 (2007)
[7] few years ago we wrote a book consist of documentary of quantization of astrophysics, title: Quantization in astrophysics, brownian motion, and supersymmetry. Tamil Nadu, 2007, available in amazon.com. (this book has been downloaded more than 1000 times in the first 3 days). url: http://vixra.org/abs/1003.0025
[8] for further discussion of Menger sponge and the CMBR/COBE data, see M. El Naschie, Chaos, Soliton, and Fractals 41 (2009) 2635-2646.
There are a number of good reason to say that big bang support evolution theory's idea of creation by pure statistical chance alone. And that is why: some people do think that big bang can happen out of nothing. That standpoint of view, albeit not new, are reiterated by stephen hawking from cambridge, in his latest book: the grand design.[1][2]
Another middle-point of view, if you are believer of middle-viewpoint, is that there is a substantial amount of complexity which is irreducible in nature, sufficient enough to say that there must be the Grand Intelligent Designer, according to Behe and a host of other proponents of ID.[3][4] But still they do not want to admit that there should be God who are behind those flawless creations.
Now if you are really an astronomy person, you can free your mind of those emotional baggage from philosophical school or other teacher who do not prove anything in their life, and start to think afresh from data:
a. if big bang is true, then the universe stabilise and evolve to become more and more structured, but that is contradiction to the basic proposition of second law of thermodynamics, that entropy is created continuously along the time. Using this argument alone, which stephen hawking should be more adept because he is famous for his black hole entropy which has never been observed.
b. furthermore, typical of philosopher like stephen hawking (even if he said that philosophy is dead), he only wish to have his words heard, regardless without sufficient proof. For you to know, according to black hole proponents, there should be blackhole inside the galaxy center of our Milky way. But despite there is very large mass inside the Milky way center, its center remains bright, that is enough disproof for the entire career of stephen hawking.
c. if you are honest astronomer, there is growing consensus of the universal law which suggest not only irreducible complexity, but also scale-organization (note that this time we do not use, self-organization). By scale organization we mean that there is seemingly organization accross different scale, which can be characterized for instance by hausdorff dimension ~2, for instance accross different astrophysics observation.[6] There is also hint pointing toward ordering in nature, for instance quantization of planets both in solar system and beyond (exoplanets) seem to suggest that the Grand Designer, means clearly God, do create and recreate the universe.[7]
d. some other clever physicist like Erwin Schrodinger has suggested that there should be negative-entropy in order to resolve the problem of entropy in the big bang and time progress, but nobody seem to observe the negative entropy.
e. similar hausdorff measure can be found in quantum mechanics. Feynman already mentioned that quantum mechanics are characterized by dimension ~2. See the work of Ord, Nottale, and others for they are already completing their program concerning scale relativity theory.[7]
f. even if your calculation points to something, which this time we should verify if stephen hawking calculate his own proposition, saying that you can create something out of nothing is not only ridiculous but awkward, just the same way as you always think of black hole which do not exist.
g. Hawking apparently argue in his last book, that based on quantum theory then the universe has multiverse-history, but that is only if we accept the notion of sum-over-history and path-integral quantum mechanics. The meaning is that what he says is full of 'ifs', furthermore hawking's model is full of fine-tuning of parameters (We discuss how the laws of our particular universe are extraordinarily finely tuned so as to allow for our existence), just like what M-theory proponents are busy trying in order they can explain elementary particles. Do not be disguised by hawking often poking with philosophical questions, because this guy has not the same quality of Einstein to ponder things deeply even with simple thinking-experiment. The result of quantization model in astrophysics, suggest that the distance between the Sun and Earth, for instance is not result of anthropic principle, but can be derived from a wave-equation model.[7] Actually, anthropic principle is another circular logic type of thinking, kind of thinking which an old guy tend to use to fool a young student.
h. another remarkable coincidence is that the Cosmic Microwave Background Temperature, that is 2.73 degree Kelvin, are surprisingly resemble menger sponge dimension. In other words, the Cosmos may look like a big sponge just like what Zel'dovich outlined few years ago.[8]
i. of course, microbiologist or palaeonthologist or philantrophist like bill gates perhaps has their own way to say whether they prefer to be believers of God or not. And even if you are a philosophy student, then you may have risk to get your grade scaled down only because you admit that you do not swallow all evolution garbage.
Finally, to quote last comment by Paul Sheldon in [1]:
"I choose to believe in a God that is so kind as to permit me to understand without dismissing me with “Just because I said so”. Such a God does do something in the universe: he is what Jaim Ginnott called a good teacher/student. My faith says I and the entire research community are manifestations of God."
What can we conclude from enormous number of astronomic observation? Apparently, if one is humble enough, then one can say along with the Psalm 19:1 : “The heavens declare the glory of God; and the firmament sheweth His handy work.” And that: “God looked down from heaven upon the children of men, to see if there were any that did understand, that did seek God.” (Psalm 53:2).
Sept. 3, 2010
love, Jesus Christ
references:
[1] http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2010/09/02/stephen-hawking-settles-the-god-question-once-and-for-all/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+CosmicVarianceBlog+%28Cosmic+Variance%29&utm_content=Twitter
[2] the grand design and some criticism, http://www.amazon.com/Grand-Design-Stephen-Hawking/dp/0553805371/
[3] comment to Behe's Darwin's Black Box: The Biochemical Challenge to Evolution, http://www.creationismstrojanhorse.com/Gross_Behe_Review_10.2007.pdf
[4] other comment on Behe,http://pondside.uchicago.edu/cluster/pdf/coyne/Behe, www.kean.edu/~bregal/docs/Behe.pdf
[5] see this smitsonian picture of center of Milky Way. In other words, milky way center show a bar and bright center, and not a black hole. url: http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2005/08/0817_050817_milkywaybar.html
[6] there is K measure suggest such large Hausdorff dimension ~2 to large scale structures, Martinis And Sosic, arXiv:astro-ph/0708.0173 (2007)
[7] few years ago we wrote a book consist of documentary of quantization of astrophysics, title: Quantization in astrophysics, brownian motion, and supersymmetry. Tamil Nadu, 2007, available in amazon.com. (this book has been downloaded more than 1000 times in the first 3 days). url: http://vixra.org/abs/1003.0025
[8] for further discussion of Menger sponge and the CMBR/COBE data, see M. El Naschie, Chaos, Soliton, and Fractals 41 (2009) 2635-2646.
Langganan:
Postingan (Atom)